Sad Thought

| | Comments (6) | TrackBacks (0)

One of the few unhappy prospects of a Hillary presidency: she would be legally precluded from making her husband Secretary of State, or indeed a Cabinet member at all, while he would be a lock for the job under any other Democratic president. And there have been few times when a country has needed a man more than America needs Bill Clinton now.

Categories

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Sad Thought.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.epenthesis.org/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/3450

6 Comments

Eric Author Profile Page said:

She could still make him UN Ambassador, right? Because he'd be perfect at that for us.

Tin Man Author Profile Page said:

Wait, why would she be legally precluded from naming him a cabinet member? What am I missing here?

Mike B. Author Profile Page said:

Because Republicans changed the law after Kennedy put his brother in charge of Justice.

Tin Man Author Profile Page said:

Wow - learn something new every day.

Andy said:

There's always the Supreme Court! With that robe, he wouldn't even have to wear pants. It's perfect for him.

Jere said:

What exactly does this law say? Is this because he is a member of her family? I wonder if it would be important enough to her to attempt to challenge the law. I would. Would having a family member as part of the cabinet inherently help or hurt that department or the administration?

He'd obviously be the biggest "unofficial" voice of a Hillary Clinton administration, so I see no issue with making it "official." He's certainly be more useful at State than planning social functions in the East Room.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mike B. published on July 31, 2007 9:49 AM.

Men At Work was the previous entry in this blog.

You Look Like a Pak'ma'ra Just Ate Your Cat is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0